Establishing the relative and cumulative impact of psychological factors on whistleblowing in South Africa

dc.contributor.advisorPrice, Gavin
dc.contributor.emailichelp@gibs.co.za
dc.contributor.postgraduateNgubane, Bathabile
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-27T05:53:13Z
dc.date.available2026-07-27T05:53:13Z
dc.date.created2026-09-02
dc.date.issued2026
dc.descriptionMini Dissertation (MBA)--University of Pretoria, 2026.
dc.description.abstractWhistleblowing is a critical mechanism for promoting accountability and ethical conduct in organisations. In South Africa, however, whistleblowing remains underutilised despite the widespread availability of formal reporting systems. This study examines the psychological factors that shape employees’ intentions to report wrongdoing. It focuses on moral courage, referent support, and confidence in anonymity. The study is grounded in a Theory of Planned Behaviour framework. A quantitative research design was adopted. Survey data were obtained from 470 valid responses collected from employees across multiple organisations. Covariance‑based structural equation modelling was used to analyse the data. The findings show that perceived referent support is the strongest predictor of whistleblowing intention. Moral courage also exerts a significant influence, although its effect is secondary to social endorsement. Confidence in anonymity does not emerge as an independent driver of intention. Instead, it operates as a contextual condition that shapes how whistleblowing is enacted rather than whether it occurs. These results challenge linear and additive assumptions embedded in dominant whistleblowing models, particularly those that emphasise formal anonymity provisions. They demonstrate that moral conviction and social endorsement must align for procedural safeguards to be effective. Whistleblowing intention follows a threshold‑based and configurational logic. Intention is most likely to emerge when moral conviction and social legitimacy are jointly present at sufficient levels. This study contributes to whistleblowing theory by demonstrating the primacy of social and moral factors over formal mechanisms. It also offers practical insights for organisations operating in high‑risk contexts. Strengthening ethical leadership and cultivating supportive organisational climates may be more effective than investing solely in reporting systems.
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricted
dc.description.degreeMBA
dc.description.departmentGordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS)
dc.description.facultyGordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS)
dc.description.sdgSDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions
dc.identifier.citation*
dc.identifier.otherA2026
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/111361
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoria
dc.rights© 2026 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.subjectWhistleblowing intention
dc.subjectReferent support
dc.subjectMoral courage
dc.subjectAnonymity confidence
dc.subjectTheory of planned behaviour
dc.titleEstablishing the relative and cumulative impact of psychological factors on whistleblowing in South Africa
dc.typeMini Dissertation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ngubane_Establishing_2026.pdf
Size:
1.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: