Please note that UPSpace will be offline from 20:00 on 9 May to 06:00 on 10 May (SAST) due to maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience caused by this.
 

Characterising railway substructure layers for rehabilitation design

dc.contributor.authorVan Vreden, Pieter H.
dc.contributor.authorHartman, Anton M.
dc.contributor.otherSouthern African Transport Conference (31st : 2012 : Pretoria, South Africa)
dc.contributor.otherMinister of Transport, South Africa
dc.contributor.upauthorGrabe, Petrus Johannes
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-05T11:19:41Z
dc.date.available2012-10-05T11:19:41Z
dc.date.created2012-07-09
dc.date.issuedJuly 2012
dc.descriptionThis paper was transferred from the original CD ROM created for this conference. The material was published using Adobe Acrobat 10.1.0 Technology. The original CD ROM was produced by Document Transformation Technologies Postal Address: PO Box 560 Irene 0062 South Africa. Tel.: +27 12 667 2074 Fax: +27 12 667 2766 E-mail: nigel@doctech URL: http://www.doctech.co.zaen_US
dc.description.abstractPaper presented at the 31st Annual Southern African Transport Conference 9-12 July 2012 "Getting Southern Africa to Work", CSIR International Convention Centre, Pretoria, South Africa.en_US
dc.description.abstractCurrent railway substructure design methods rely heavily on an accurate assessment of the in-situ material properties, particularly the modulus of the subgrade and substructure layers. This information is used in foundation design models to determine the required cover to prevent deformation and failure of support. This paper presents typical data obtained during a rehabilitation design investigation to accurately evaluate the modulus of the in situ subgrade and substructure layers using Pencel pressuremeter tests, dynamic cone penetrometer tests, deflection measurements through remote video monitoring and lightweight drop-weight tests. Standard soil parameters related to the grading, plasticity and CBR of the investigated materials do not have any direct relationship with the modulus values that were obtained. This is specifically true for sand materials where good or poor CBR and plasticity values can give a misleading indication of the formation modulus.en_US
dc.description.librariandm2012en
dc.format.extent11 pagesen_US
dc.format.mediumPDFen_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-920017-53-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/20028
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDocument Transformation Technologies
dc.relation.ispartofSATC 2012
dc.rightsUniversity of Pretoriaen_US
dc.subjectPencel pressuremeter testsen_US
dc.subjectRailway structure designsen_US
dc.subject.lcshTransportation
dc.subject.lcshTransportation -- Africa
dc.subject.lcshTransportation -- Southern Africa
dc.titleCharacterising railway substructure layers for rehabilitation designen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Van Vreden_Characterising(2012).pdf
Size:
420.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Conference Presentation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: