Please note that UPSpace will be offline from 20:00 on 9 May to 06:00 on 10 May (SAST) due to maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience caused by this.
 

Are former commercial farmers in Zimbabwe satisfied with the global compensation agreement?

dc.contributor.authorZulch, Benita
dc.contributor.authorYacim, Joseph Awoamim
dc.contributor.authorParadza, Partson
dc.contributor.emailu14052190@tuks.co.zaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-03T08:23:39Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractZimbabwe’s new administration indicated its willingness to end the compensation dispute, which lasted for two decades with former commercial farmers (FCFs), by signing the global compensation agreement (GCA). In the agreement, the Government of Zimbabwe (GoZ) offered to pay the sum of 3.5 billion, United States Dollars (USD) to the FCFs for their expropriated farmlands. A study carried out by the Valuation Consortium (Valcon) before the GCA signing revealed that most of the FCFs accepted the compensation offered by the expropriating authority. Thus far, no study has been done to assess the level of satisfaction of the affected FCFs, with the GCA provisions. Therefore, this study evaluated the views of FCFs and members of the Compensation Committee (MsCC) on this subject. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey which was mailed directly to the Chairperson of the FCFs, who sent it to other members to respond to issues raised. The study found mixed views by the FCFs on their levels of satisfaction with the GCA. Thus, the study concluded that compensation offered was not entirely satisfactory because it did not include accruals for delayed payment, professional fees, and a detailed breakdown of the compensable heads of claim.en_US
dc.description.departmentConstruction Economicsen_US
dc.description.embargo2023-02-17
dc.description.librarianhj2022en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjpr20en_US
dc.identifier.citationBenita Zulch, Joseph (JA) Yacim & Partson Paradza (2022) Are former commercial farmers in Zimbabwe satisfied with the global compensation agreement?, Journal of Property Research, 39:2, 97-119, DOI: 10.1080/09599916.2021.1965644.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-9916 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1466-4453 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1080/09599916.2021.1965644
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/86663
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an electronic version of an article published in Journal of Property Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 97-119, 2022. doi : 10.1080/09599916.2021.1965644. Journal of Property Research is available online at : https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjpr20.en_US
dc.subjectCompensationen_US
dc.subjectExpropriationen_US
dc.subjectFarmersen_US
dc.subjectOfferen_US
dc.subjectSatisfactionen_US
dc.subjectZimbabween_US
dc.subjectFormer commercial farmers (FCFs)en_US
dc.subjectGlobal compensation agreement (GCA)en_US
dc.titleAre former commercial farmers in Zimbabwe satisfied with the global compensation agreement?en_US
dc.typePostprint Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Zulch_Are_2022.pdf
Size:
343.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: